Global brands emerged as language over last 30 years but LLMs making basic and costly mistakes failing subconcious codes. Ask for example chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Over 50 years ago at The Economist dad Norman debated main purposes of satellites - pity human intelligence has not done this. "Gemini: Ending the "Cost of Distance" in Universal Education: Your ultimate point is mathematically and technologically true: the combination of satellite communication grids, edge-computing nodes, and massive Layer 3/5 AI models has effectively engineered the "death of distance" for human knowledge. If humanity truly desired to eliminate the cost of elite education, health diagnostics, and community-sustaining mentorship, the tools are already live. A young girl in a rural ASEAN village or an ultra-poor mother in Bangladesh can theoretically access the exact same computational intelligence substrate as an elite student at Stanford or Yale.
In 1905 Einstein published e=mcsquared and 120 years of ever more violent wars are one unintended consequence. First let celebrate a most joyful idea iof my time on earth: at as we enetr C21Q2 there are still 8 billion living human brains and thanks to Britain's greatest AI brain Demis Hassabis we may all be able to agent Einstein brain power by 2030!
Join AIWHitehouse ...Minimum AI Brief to all teachers ;;Day 366 Trump2.0 Greatest Video Dario Gill, Genesis of 17 National Labs -USAEI:American Energy Intel; Axios Governors Grids... DC March 11 scsp .ai+education summit & ... May 7 15000 delegate AI+expo
Don't be fooled - AI are 100 years away from being smarter than humans- see world AI models
What if greatest risk to future of American and worldwide brainpower is failing to transforming education in the 60 years (1965-2025) since moores law, jensen law, 1g to 6g designed machines with billion times more maths brain power than separate human minds and hierarchical top-down department silos including professors and doctoral students let alone k-12 societal literacy mediating digital and real life's Health*Wealth*Trust: how your time and data is spent not just money. Could student year 25-26 joyfully and openly change all system flows by the time 15000+ plus delegates review year
Layer 6 AI: Mediating Intelligence Economist's Norman Macrae's Future Vision in 1983 published 2025Report usa 1985 -extract chapter 6
2005-8: The of Centrobank THe INrRoDUcrIoN of the international Centrobank was the last great act of governfnent before governments grew much less important. It was not a conception of policy-making governments at all, but emerged from the first computerized town meeting of the world. By 2005 the gap in income and expectations between the rich and poor nations was recognized to be man's most dangerous problem. The satellite TC system and two-way cable television channels in sixty-eight countries invited their viewers to participate in a computer conference about it, in the form of a series of weekly TC programs. Recommendations tapped in by viewers were to be tried out on a computer model of the world economy. If recommendations were shown by the model to be likely to make the world economic situation worse, they were lntroduction t sl l THE 2025 REPORT to be discarded. If recommendations were reported by the model to make the economic situation in poor couptries better, they were to be retained for "ongoing computer analysis" in the next program. In 2025 it is easy to see this as a forerunner of the TC conferences which play so large a part in our lives today, both as pastime and as the principal innovative device in business. But the truth about this 2005 breakthrough tends to irk the highbrows. It succeeded because it was initially a rather downmarket network television program. This is illustrated by the fact that the two gold-medal-winning telecommuters who were eventually acclaimed for contributing most to Centrobank's birth were Mr. S. C. Hu, the thoughtful and rich retired merchant of Taipeh in Taiwan, and Mr. Bjorn Heglund, the earnest young subpostmaster from the Kiruna district of north Sweden. Neither would conceivably have been consulted if a conference on the subject had been called mainly among the best-educated economists of 2005. About 400 million people watched the first program, and 3 million individuals or groups tapped in suggestions. Around 99 per cent of these were rejected by the computer as being likely to increase the unhappiness of mankind. It became known that these rejects included suggestions submitted by the World Council of Churches (whose "Charter 2006" was reported by the computer to be likely to increase unhappiness among 87 per cent of the population of the world) and by many other pressure groups. This still left 31,000 suggestions that were accepted by the computer model as worthy of ongoing analysis. As these were honed, and details were added to the most interestitg, an exciting consensus began to emerge. Later programs were watched by nearly a billion people as it became recognized that something important was being born. These audiences were swollen by successful telegimmicks. The presenter of the opening part of the first program was a roly-poly professor who was that year's Nobel laureate in economics, and who proved a natural television personality. He explained that economists now agreed that aid programs could 52 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobank sometimes help poor countries, but sometimes most definitely made their circumstances worse. When Mexico was inflating at over 80 per cent a year in the early 1980s, the inflow to it of huge loanable funds made its inflation even faster and its crash more certain. The professor set Mexico's 1979-81 economy on the model, pumped in the loaned funds and showed how all the indicators (higher inflation, lower real gross domestic product, and so on) then flashed red, signalling an economy getting worse, rather than green, signalling an economy getting better. He followed this with similar examples from several other poor countries in Latin America and Africa during 1950-85. The professor then put the model back to mirror the contemporary world economy of 2005, and played into it various nostrums that had been recommended by politicians of left, right and center, but mostly left. The dials generally flashed red. Then the professor provided another set of recommendations, and asked any viewers who wished to play to tap in their own guesses for the consequent movements in twenty economic variables in the model. Those who got their guesses right to within a set error were told they had qualified for the second round of a knock-out economic guesstimators' world championship. Knock-out competitions of this sort continued for ordinary users of two-way TCs throughout the series of programs. In the second part of that first program the presenters dared to introduce two political problems into the game. They said that government-to-government aid programs had been particularly popular among politicians during the age of overgovernment, but there was growing agreement that government- to-government aid was the worst method of hand-out. The excessive role played by governments in many poor countries was one of the barriers to their economic advance, and a main destroyer of their people's freedom. Could anybody think it would have been wise to give aid to President Mbogo? In consequence, the most successful economic aid programs had been those operated through the International Monetary Fund, which imposed conditions on how borrowing governments should operate. The professor showed that IMF-moni- 53 THE 2025 REPORT tored operations in most years had brought more green flashes from the model than red, which few other sorts of schemes had done. But this involved IMF officials-often from the rich countries- in telling governments of poor countries what to do; and one of the objectives of the initiative called for by President Kennedy was precisely to diminish such embarrassments. The first questions to be asked in the next few programs, said the compilers, were (l) which countries should qualify for aid?; and, having decided that , (2) up to what limits and conditions?; and (3) through what mechanisms? They promised that later programs after the first half-dozen would examine how any scheme could be used to diminish the power of governments and increase the power of free markets and free people. The first stage of this computerized town meeting of the world went remarkably well. A consensus quickly emerged that poor countries which agreed to join a club with certain libertarian nrles (the principal ones were that markets instead of politicians should set prices; there should be fairly free trade, and fairly free immigration of people and businesses from countries richer than themselves; human rights cases should be referred to an international supreme court) could also have access to the benefits of a new international central bank called the "Centrobank." The Centrobank should be a body which relied very little on the discretion of its governor, but much more on a computer program. This program should authorize the Centrobank to print enough new foreign exchange called bancor for any applicant country below a certain income per head to allow its internal economic growth to proceed at the fastest possible noninflationary pace but not by one penny faster. The Centrobank's computer would monitor each recipient country's economy to see if inflationary or other strains were appearing, and would signal that Centrobank must cut off new supplies of artificially created foreign exchange if they did. Contemporary critics said in triple self-contradiction that (a) this scheme was so insulting to poor countries' governments 54 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobonk that few would agree to join it; (b) all poor countries would flock to eat at this trough and there would be an impossibly inflationary expansion of world money supply; and that (c) the anti-inflationary terms proffered from the international central bank were so tough that this would still allow only painfully slow economic depauperization. Now that the Centrobank has been in operation for nearly twenty years we know that the answer to (a) is that the government of any poor country that does not join Centrobank is likely to be booted out by its people; that the answer to (b) is that, despite this flood of countries into the scheme, newly created foreign exchange for poor countries has in only one year,2Ol3, exceeded 0.2 per cent of world-wide money supply (WM3); and that the answer to (c) is that progress proved remarkably fast, although that was partly because of the answers that emerged to the second set of questions posed in the next few programs. The second set of questions which arose after about the eighth program rested on what sorts of purchases should qualify for Centrobank payments. Originally the notion had been that the international Centrobank should open foreign exchange clearing accounts to finance non-inflationary purchases by any persons or any groups in qualifying poor countries. The stated aim was that a poor country should not be prevented merely by shortage of foreign exchange from pursuing the fastest possible rate of non-inflationary economic growth. But under the remorseless logic of the computer a bias was soon introduced in favor of financing purchases by citizens in poor countries rather than purchases by their governments.It became clear that projects by cost-disregarding governments in poor countries led more quickly to inflation than projects undertaken either (a) by penny-pinching native entrepreneurs (who began to apPear out of the woodwork in some profusion and in extraordinary places); or (b) by competing multinational corporations on new sorts of performance contracts. If you ask your TCs today, "What were the main evil con- 55 THE 2025 REPORT sequences of the colonial and immediate post-colonial periods in the poor two-thirds of the world?" two of the top answers will be: "The fact that an entrepreneurial class could not emerge as an important political constituency until the introduction of Centrobank after 200 5 :' and "The fact that until Centrobank no mechanism except uncompetitive government was put in place to meet many of the most urgent demands of the poorest three-quarters of the peopl e." Centrobank's solution to the first of these problems owed much to the proposals from Mr. Hu; its solution to the second problem owed much to the proposals from Mr.Heglund. Start with why Mr. Hu's proposals for encouraging entrepreneurs were so important. Growth had taken place in Europe and Japan and North America after 1850 because an entrepreneurial commercial class had become a dominant political influence, replacing the aristocracies in Europe and Japan and the mhlange misdescribed by de Tocqueville in North America. In the immediate post-colonial period in the poor countries circa 1960-2005 power fell instead into the hands of a new class of professional politicians , dt a time when they could temporarily do damaging things inconceivable for professional politicians before or (thank God) since. Their most damaging act was to set "political" instead of market prices. By statutory decree in many poor countries exchange rates and urban wages had been kept too high, food prices to farmers and prices for public utilities kept too low, credit had been allocated by rationin g at negative real interest rates, and imports had been rationed by licences that were immensely profitable to the politicians' brothers-in-law who were corruptly granted them. Even in 2005 every single computer program showed that living standards were increased, inflation brought down, and huppiness and efticiency advanced, when these policies were abandoned. So did every practical example. Call up on your TCs the practical example of Taiwan in the second half of the twentieth century; analysis of its success was the basis for Mr. Hu's proposals for Centrobank. Taiwan in 56 ,N -; .I, tII 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank 1950-2000 had multiplied its real income twentyfold and its dollar exports four-hundredfold because in the 1950s an invading warlord and his soldiers had been impelled by odd circumstances into laissez-faire economic policies against their will; and because Taiwan had thereafter been kept dynamically entrepreneurial largely because of nasty protectionism by rich countries against its exports. When in 1948 the armies of General Chiang Kai-shek fled from the Chinese mainland to Taiw&r, swelling its population overnight, they found an island which relied for over 90 per cent of its exports on rice and sugar. These were two commodities whose sales could not be greatly increased on world markets by dropping their international price. It therefore seemed natural to the incoming soldiers to follow the mistaken policies adopted by so many other authoritarian governments in poor countries all through 1950-2005. For a while they exploited the farmers by keeping internal farm prices too low and Taiwan's international exchange rate artificially high. The soldiers also granted cheap credits to themselves to set up manufacturing businesses. The results of such folly were the usual ones: food production and exports fell; inflation soared to three-digit figures; and foreign exchange holdings collapsed despite huge American aid. The soldiers met this by restricting imports further to protect their infant industries and their disappearing exchange reserves; this sent inflation even higher. As sugar and rice production used up much land in the overcrowded island, real estate prices in particular went through the roof. This economic mess was sadly typical of many newly independent countries at the time, but Taiwan was lucky in being newly dependent instead. General Chiang Kai-shek was at this time entirely dependent politically on the Americans, and he unwillingly agreed to propitiate them by accepting their good advice. He moved in the late 1950s pretty abruptly from the then usual developing-country wrong policies (low prices to farmers; protected home market for manufactures but overvalued exchange rate; subsidized interest rates) to the unfash- 57 THE 2025 REPORT ionable and precisely opposite right policies (market prices for farmers and market-determined exchange rates and interest rates; trade liberalization). The results exceeded all expectations. With its market-determined exchange rate, Taiwan found that its cheap-labor exports of umbrellas et cetera expanded smoothly-until foreign umbrella-makers objected to Taiwan's penetration of their domestic markets; then Taiwan's expansion in that particular product would abmptly stop. So Taiwan grew through its industrial miracle of 1955-2005 knowing that its businesses must find new products for new markets all the time, and that last year's successful firm would often have to close down this year. In consequence of its recognition that bureaucrats cannot know what will be profitable next minute, Taiwan subsidized only one thing apart from its over-large army: its tax and social nonwelfare policies were directed to raising savings from 5 per cent of national income in the 1950s to a Japan-beating 25 per cent in the 1980s. Mr. Hu recommended that the policies furthered by Centrobank in poor countries should be those that had "been furthered by accident in my country, Taiwan:' and he suggested some of the relevant software by which the Centrobank's computer model could put these incentives into effect. He was rather too inclined to argue that "anybody who does not follow these policies should not get Centrobank aid," but the process of ongoing computer analysis synthesized most of this into the messag€, "If you are following Taiwan-type polici€s, then the computer will allow a much higher level of internal expansion before it flashes the signal that inflation is being fostered so that further Centrobank creation for you must stop." As the coordinating Nobel laureate said when presenting Mr. Hu with one of the two gold medals: His software provided one of the two quantum leaps that turned Centrobank into a success. Although the 1955-2005 Taiwan-type policies hugely expanded national income, the pressure groups in favor of them are entrepreneurs who do 58 2005J; The Introduction of Centrobank not come into being until the policies have already been introduced. In most poor countries that have been following the old and opposite policies of import substitution and pricerigging, the political constituencies in favor of the old policies are by definition more powerful. This is a main reason why these old-fashioned countries remain poor. In some Latin American countries right-wing generals have periodically seized power, and put into effect policies that are supposed to be laissez-faire. But these generals generally have to rely for their political mandate on the few old families who already own big businesses in these countries. Even with the best will in the world (which these right-wing generals rarely have) they tend therefore to support and protect yesterday's big capitalists, rather than the grubby entrepreneurs in back rooms on whom growth most depends. Mr. Hu's proposals managed to make Centrobank's computer programs mirror the dependence on entrepreneurs created by historical accident in the 1950-2005 success stories of Japan (which ploughed through yesterday's powerful families in 1945 and had to rely on entrepreneurs thereafter), Singapore (which benefited from not having any farmers or mral classes to exploit), Hong Kong (which did not have any political constituencies, only entrepreneurs) and Taiwan. Although Mr. Hu was rightly decorated for "enabling Centrobank policies to speak with a Taiwanese accent," the later stages of the first computerized town meeting of the world were carried on more like one of today's many million computer conferences than like the original television network program in which Mr. Hu joined. People after about program fourteen did not put in their views instantly, but after some days' consideration and after checking with the database which showed what was the presumed best form for Centrobank at the moment. The computer still rejected the 99 per cent of proposals made to it that were nonsense; it still incorporated for ongoing analysis the less than 1 per cent of suggestions that seemed sensible and relevant; but it also now introduced a new cate- 59 THE 2025 REPORT gory. It picked up those contrary views that seemed plausibly sensible, but not suitable for the emerging form of Centrobank's consensus, and put proposers of such ideas in touch with people holding similar views around the world. From the views of this constructive opposition to "Hu plus 33,I79 people's telecommunicated and accepted improvements," one new consensus objection began to emerge. "f,Jnder the Taiwanese system," wrote one objector, "the main incentive to entrepreneurs in poor countries is to produce for fairly rich consumers, abroad or at home. If most of the seventy to eighty countries in the Centrobank scheme started exporting cheap-labor umbrellas as Taiwan did in the 1950s , a glut of umbrellas would rather soon appear. It would be better if new entrepreneurs could be encouraged to provide more of the things desperately needed by the poorest three-quarters of the people in these poor lands." How to do this? It was no good saying that poor countries should follow more egalitarian tax policies so as to direct more of their internal demand to things needed by their own poorest people. In the United States in the second half of the twentieth century, marginal tax rates generally took around one half of earned incomes above about six times gross national product per head. Even this only managed to reduce Gini coefficients, the best measure of wealth inequality, from something like 0.39 to something like 0.34. In Africa in 2000 GNP per head was around $500 a year. Any egalitarian tax policy which promised to halve all incomes above $3,000 a year would have (a) killed all initiative; (b) stirred politicians' brothers-in-law, civil servants and-most important-army officers (who got over $3,000 a year) into instant coups d'€tat Moreover, ro mechanisms existed in these countries to provide cheaply the complicated services the very poor needed most urgently. This was the problem that benefited from the proposals of Bjorn Heglund, who had long urged that the public services needed in his native North Sweden should be provided competitively by private entrepreneurs on performance contracts, along the lines of experiments which had been tried in the 1990s 60 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank by various worthy Swedish international aid organizations which "adopted" certain Third World villages. As was said at the presentation of Heglund's gold medal: We at Centrobank began to realize that poor countries could best grow richer by selling simple cheap-labor goods to the rich world-a process that did not involve them in using our proffered foreign exchange at all, although it had become possible only after they responded to Centrobank's initial incentives d la "Hu plus 33,179." The right way to use their new foreign exchange was often to provide mechanisms d la Heglund whereby Western firms are encouraged to make money by providing the services that the poorest three-quarters in the poor world most need. The time was ripe for this experiment, especially in such fields as medicine. The trend even in the West at this time was to new sorts of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), through which people paid performance fees to physicians and their assistants if they kept them pnd their families healthy. It was early decided to put the competitive services provided by multinational HMOs into the pool which would qualify for Centrobank payments. Sophisticated computer measurements of people's health were coming into fashion, and three young doctors just out of medical school at the University of Minneapolis drew the largest single Centrobank payment in 2009 when their HMO, resting heavily on telecommunicated X-rays and long-range computer analyses, plus quickly trained local paramedics and some helicopter- carried Western doctors on call, plus recommended dietary changes and some environmental changes which new staffs personally put into effect (cleaning wells, etc.), brought an extraordinary improvement in the health indices of people over a wide stretch of Africa's desperately poor Sahel. Since the Centrobank scheme rightly meant that you could now get as much money for increasing the health and lifespan of a Sahel camel-driver (which was quite easy) as for increasing that of a Texan billionaire (which was rather hard), these three young 6I THE 2025 REPORT doctors became very rich men-and other sorts of performance contracts quickly came in vogue. This revolution in attitudes and

Monday, September 30, 2024

Can UN SDGs be turned into LLM (smart chat) or an AI Game?

 Perplexity advice  January 2025  -  comments welcome chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Washington DC Region

Pro Search

Sources
[PDF] AI & THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: THE STATE OF ...
sustainability.com favicon
sustainability
MBZUAI and UNDP partnership to advance use of artificial ...
undp.org favicon
undp
[PDF] Opportunities and options for integrating climate change adaptation ...
unfccc.int favicon
unfccc
sei.org favicon
climateanalytics.org favicon
c2es.org favicon
journals.plos.org favicon
globalgoals.withgoogle.com favicon
sdg.iisd.org favicon
Show all
Answer
Your perspective on treating the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a language of interconnected subsystems is insightful and aligns with emerging approaches in systems thinking and sustainability science. Indeed, viewing the SDGs as interlinked systems rather than isolated goals is crucial for addressing complex global challenges.

SDGs as Interconnected Systems

The SDGs are inherently interconnected, and progress in one area often impacts others. For example:
  • SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) is closely linked to SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), as water is essential for food production and sanitation
    1
    .
  • SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) has implications for SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities)
    2
    .
Your suggestion to replace SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) with AI platforms as collaborations between corporates, governments, and communities is an interesting proposition. AI indeed has the potential to contribute significantly to achieving the SDGs by optimizing resource management, improving efficiency, and providing innovative solutions to complex problems
5
.

Systems Thinking and AI

Applying systems thinking to the SDGs and leveraging AI could offer several benefits:
  1. Holistic problem-solving: AI can help model complex interactions between different SDGs, enabling more comprehensive solutions
    5
    .
  2. Data-driven decision making: AI can process vast amounts of data to identify patterns and trends across multiple SDGs
    5
    .
  3. Predictive analysis: Machine learning models can forecast potential outcomes of various interventions, considering the interconnected nature of the SDGs
    7
    .

Mathematical Modeling and Climate Change

Your observation about the mathematical failure to understand systems multiplying each other is pertinent, especially in the context of climate change. The 1.5°C warming threshold, established in the Paris Agreement, was indeed meant to be a long-term average rather than a single-year occurrence
10
. However, recent data suggests we may temporarily exceed this threshold sooner than anticipated
11
.

Systemic Approach to Disaster Reporting

Your suggestion for disaster reports to include summaries of driving system factors is valuable. This approach could help:
  1. Identify root causes and interconnections between various factors contributing to disasters.
  2. Develop more effective, holistic strategies for disaster prevention and mitigation.
  3. Enhance public understanding of complex systemic issues underlying disasters.

Moving Forward

To address these complex challenges more effectively, we need:
  1. Integrated modeling: Develop more sophisticated models that capture the multiplicative and exponential interactions between different SDGs and climate factors
    26
    .
  2. AI-powered systems analysis: Leverage AI to analyze and predict complex system behaviors across multiple SDGs
    25
    .
  3. Transdisciplinary collaboration: Foster cooperation between experts in various fields to develop comprehensive solutions
    1
    .
  4. Improved communication: Enhance transparency and public understanding of complex systemic issues and their implications
    31
    .
By adopting these approaches, we can better respect and address the needs of those affected by disasters, like the recent wildfires in Los Angeles, and work towards more effective, systemic solutions to global challenges.
I don't want to get into political debate but among few system designs that i have heard of as truly heroic - world bank president Banga has been mediaiting with african union. If they will connect 100 million africans in clean electricity by 2030 he will do everything he can to get the world bank to invest in 200 million clean electricity across africa mainly to people currently without any electrricity. Of course it would be valid to debate whether other multinationsals could join in but I feel bt framing this as a langauge challenge with SDG 17 (overall inteligence system)being the overall ai needed to complete the 300 million access chalenge one has a map or even a game that people around the world can linkin. I expect there is a better way of describing this but do you know if anyone is helping Banga frame thsi continental system challenge?

Pro Search

Sources
Ajay Banga Discusses Prosperity, Conflict, And Climate
hoover.org favicon
hoover
New Partnership Aims to Connect 300 million to electricity by 2030
worldbank.org favicon
worldbank
GEAPP, Rockefeller Foundation, SEforALL Advance World Bank ...
seforall.org favicon
seforall
time.com favicon
devex.com favicon
worldbank.org favicon
live.worldbank.org favicon
rockefellerfoundation.org favicon
youtube.com favicon
Show all
Answer
World Bank President Ajay Banga's ambitious initiative, known as "Mission 300," aims to connect 300 million people in Africa to electricity by 2030. This bold plan is indeed a significant step towards addressing the energy access challenge in Africa and aligning with sustainable development goals.The initiative breaks down as follows:
  1. The World Bank Group has committed to connecting 250 million people to electricity through distributed renewable energy systems or the distribution grid
    1
    6
    .
  2. The African Development Bank will support an additional 50 million people
    1
    6
    .
This collaborative effort is gaining momentum and attracting support from various partners:
  1. The Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet (GEAPP), Sustainable Energy for All (SEforALL), and The Rockefeller Foundation have announced their support for Mission 300
    3
    8
    .
  2. These organizations are launching a new technical assistance facility, creating an M300 Leadership Group, and activating private-sector financing for electrification programs in Africa
    3
    8
    .
While Banga hasn't explicitly framed this initiative as a language challenge or game, the approach does align with systems thinking and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Here's how it relates to your concept:
  1. SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) is directly addressed by this initiative
    18
    .
  2. The project's scale and ambition make it a potential model for addressing other SDGs in a systematic way.
  3. The collaboration between multiple organizations and sectors reflects the interconnected nature of development challenges, as highlighted in SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals)
    18
    .
Banga has emphasized the need for partnerships and ambition to realize this goal:
  1. He's called for policy action from governments, financing from multilateral development banks, and private sector investment
    7
    .
  2. The initiative is leveraging collaborations across the World Bank, IFC, MIGA, and development partners to accelerate decentralized renewable energy access
    27
    .
While there isn't explicit evidence of Banga framing this as a language or game challenge, the initiative's structure and partnerships do create a framework that could be viewed as a "map" or "game" for global participation. The clear target (300 million connections), defined roles for different organizations, and the emphasis on innovative financing and partnerships all contribute to this systemic approach.As the initiative progresses, there may be opportunities to further develop this framing, potentially incorporating AI and other technologies to track progress, optimize resource allocation, and engage global participants in meeting this ambitious goal
28
.
>>>Its interesting before Banga if you went into the hallway of the world bank you were greeted by our purpose is to end extreme poverty this has been extended to end extreme poverty by making planet livable with by every community. We can think of both the old aim and the new one as languages with quite a lot of change of intelligence mapping- Does this make sense - and in some ways can this approach help educators without getting cuaght up in politics?

Pro Search

Sources
[PDF] Ending Poverty on a Livable Planet - Development Committee
devcommittee.org favicon
devcommittee
Loud and Clear: Effective Language of Instruction Policies for Learning
worldbank.org favicon
worldbank
What You Should Know About Systems Thinking | Asia Society
asiasociety.org favicon
asiasociety
weforum.org favicon
blogs.worldbank.org favicon
worldbank.org favicon
edutopia.org favicon
pedagogyofconfidence.net favicon
thesystemsthinker.com favicon
Show all
Answer
The World Bank's expanded mission to end extreme poverty while making the planet livable for every community does indeed represent a significant shift in focus and language. This evolution in the World Bank's purpose reflects a growing recognition of the interconnected nature of global challenges and aligns well with systems thinking approaches.

Systems Thinking in Development

Viewing the World Bank's old and new missions through a systems thinking lens offers several advantages:
  1. Interconnectedness: The new mission acknowledges the intricate relationships between poverty, shared prosperity, and environmental sustainability. This aligns with systems thinking principles that emphasize understanding connections between different elements
    3
    .
  2. Holistic Approach: By incorporating the concept of a "livable planet," the World Bank is taking a more comprehensive view of development, considering both human and environmental factors
    1
    .
  3. Long-term Perspective: The inclusion of planetary concerns reflects a longer-term, more sustainable approach to development, which is a key aspect of systems thinking
    9
    .

Benefits for Educators

Applying this systems thinking approach to education can be beneficial without becoming entangled in political debates:
  1. Interdisciplinary Learning: Educators can use this framework to design curricula that integrate various subjects, helping students understand complex global issues
    17
    .
  2. Critical Thinking Skills: By introducing systems mapping and other visual tools, teachers can help students develop critical thinking skills and understand complex relationships
    19
    .
  3. Real-world Relevance: This approach allows educators to connect classroom learning to real-world challenges, making education more engaging and relevant
    7
    .
  4. Language of Instruction: The World Bank's focus on effective language of instruction policies aligns with this systems approach, recognizing that language is a crucial factor in learning outcomes and broader development goals
    11
    20
    .

Practical Implementation

Educators can implement these ideas through:
  1. Visual Mapping: Using tools like Thinking Maps to help students visualize and understand complex systems and relationships
    22
    .
  2. Project-Based Learning: Designing projects that require students to consider multiple factors and their interactions, mirroring real-world development challenges
    17
    .
  3. Cross-curricular Connections: Encouraging students to draw connections between different subjects, much like how the World Bank now connects poverty reduction with environmental sustainability
    3
    .
By focusing on these practical, educational applications of systems thinking, educators can help students develop a more nuanced understanding of global challenges without becoming embroiled in political controversies. This approach can prepare students to think critically about complex issues and contribute meaningfully to sustainable development efforts in the future.
People migh ask why africa. I certainly dont think africa is the only conteinent to which this language model could be llm'd. But the fact is afruca has far less infrastructure - and in some ways that is an advantage because it is clear that when a country already has huge histiric investments in infrastructure it can be difficult to explain why one region should have to chnage first. Acullay continents that call themselves united worry me because it seems in advertising world, united meeans least common denominatir rather than highest integrated commons. I have read so=ome somewhere that by 2040s half the words children will be african. If tis is so its another reason why banga investment pilot priority seems good. I am not at this moement trying to assess who should get the value of all this except that local communities ending extreme poverty coudl come first.

Pro Search

Sources
Key findings – Africa Energy Outlook 2022 – Analysis - IEA
iea.org favicon
iea
African leaders call for more investments in green energy and water ...
un.org favicon
un
Empowering people – the role of local energy communities in clean ...
iea.org favicon
iea
energyalliance.org favicon
nepad.org favicon
irena.org favicon
wri.org favicon
iea.org favicon
frontiersin.org favicon
Show all
Answer
Your perspective on Africa's potential for clean energy development and infrastructure investment is insightful. There are indeed several compelling reasons why focusing on Africa makes sense in the context of global energy transitions and sustainable development:

Africa's Demographic Advantage

By 2050, Africa is projected to be home to a significant portion of the world's children and youth:
  • Approximately 40% of all births and children globally will be in Africa, up from about 10% in 1950
    29
    .
  • More than one-third of Sub-Saharan Africa's population will be younger than 15 in 2040
    24
    .
This demographic shift presents both challenges and opportunities. With proper investment in education, skills development, and infrastructure, Africa could harness a substantial demographic dividend.

Infrastructure Advantage

As you noted, Africa's relatively less developed infrastructure can be an advantage in some ways:
  • It allows for leapfrogging outdated technologies and directly implementing modern, clean energy solutions
    1
    .
  • The continent can build new systems and networks designed around future environmental stressors and energy demands, without being constrained by legacy infrastructure
    12
    .

Renewable Energy Potential

Africa has immense renewable energy resources:
  • The continent is home to 60% of the best solar resources globally
    1
    .
  • There's significant potential for wind, hydropower, and geothermal energy as well
    5
    .

Economic and Social Benefits

Investing in clean energy in Africa can yield multiple benefits:
  • Job creation and economic growth
    18
  • Improved health outcomes by reducing air pollution
    31
  • Enhanced food security through solar-powered irrigation and agricultural processing
    32

Addressing Energy Poverty

Prioritizing universal clean energy access in Africa aligns with global sustainable development goals:
  • As of 2022, about 600 million people in Africa lacked access to electricity
    1
    .
  • Clean energy investments can help eradicate energy poverty while supporting low-carbon development
    30
    .

World Bank Initiative

The World Bank's "Mission 300" initiative, led by President Ajay Banga, aims to connect 300 million people in Africa to electricity by 2030. This ambitious plan demonstrates the growing recognition of Africa's potential and the need for targeted investments in the continent's energy infrastructure
1
2
.While Africa certainly isn't the only continent where this approach could be applied, its unique combination of demographic trends, untapped renewable resources, and the opportunity to build sustainable infrastructure from the ground up makes it a compelling focus for clean energy investments. The potential to lift millions out of poverty while simultaneously advancing global climate goals makes this a particularly impactful strategy.
>>>Do you know if there is any transarent audit of which african countries actually have which resources even (if underdeveloped). For example it may be the case that the Congo has the most rare minerals. If so there needs to be worldwide awareness of this so that the congolese do not lose while those who advance livable planet investments for the congolese coudl have some share. Maybe there needs to be a congolese bit coin or some other mechnaism so that intergenerational dfimacial transparency is acheved. at all levels for congolese people ; for congolese as central to the contiemt; for all continemts to progress harmoniously with peace not war wherever africa and world trade or sdg advances are linked overall by intelligence translation

Pro Search

Sources
Figure of the week: Natural resource governance in Africa
brookings.edu favicon
brookings
The ITSCI laundromat - Global Witness
globalwitness.org favicon
globalwitness
How can transparency lead to real accountability in the extractives ...
gga.org favicon
gga
bakermckenzie.com favicon
weforum.org favicon
unep.org favicon
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov favicon
sipri.org favicon
transparency.org favicon
Show all
Answer
While there isn't a single comprehensive transparent audit of African countries' undeveloped resources, several initiatives and reports provide insights into the continent's mineral wealth, with a particular focus on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC):
  1. Resource Mapping:
    The African Minerals Development Centre (AMDC) works on geological mapping and resource assessment across Africa. However, their data is not always publicly accessible or fully transparent.
  2. DRC's Mineral Wealth:
    The DRC is indeed recognized as having some of the world's largest reserves of rare and valuable minerals:
  • It holds an estimated 70% of the world's coltan reserves
    1
    .
  • The DRC produces about 70% of the world's cobalt
    17
    .
  • It has significant reserves of copper, diamond, tantalum, tin, and gold
    17
    .
  1. Transparency Initiatives:
    Several programs aim to increase transparency in resource management:
  • The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) includes 24 African countries, promoting openness in resource revenues
    3
    .
  • The Africa Initiative, supported by the Global Forum, works to improve tax transparency and combat illicit financial flows
    13
    36
    .
  1. Blockchain for Transparency:
    Some efforts are underway to use blockchain technology for tracking minerals:
  • A pilot project aims to trace cobalt from DRC mines to end products using blockchain
    32
    .
  • The Rwandan government has implemented a blockchain system to trace tantalum
    26
    .
  1. Financial Mechanisms:
    While a specific "Congolese bitcoin" doesn't exist, there are related concepts:
  • The Central African Republic briefly considered adopting Bitcoin as legal tender
    45
    .
  • Virunga National Park in the DRC has set up a Bitcoin mining operation to support conservation efforts
    46
    .
  1. Intergenerational and Regional Benefits:
    Several initiatives aim to ensure long-term benefits for Congolese people and the region:
  • The African Beneficial Ownership Transparency Network (AfBOTN) works to improve transparency in resource ownership
    47
    .
  • The USAID Zahabu Safi (Clean Gold) Project aims to establish responsible gold supply chains in eastern DRC
    50
    .
Challenges remain in achieving full transparency and equitable distribution of resource wealth. Continued international cooperation, technological innovation, and local empowerment will be crucial for progress. Balancing resource exploitation with environmental protection and community development, as seen in initiatives like the Water-Energy-Ecosystems Nexus project
49
, will be essential for sustainable development in the DRC and across Africa.
Related
Which African countries have the most transparent natural resource governance
How can the implementation gaps in resource governance be addressed in sub-Saharan Africa
What are the best practices in natural resource governance from countries like Botswana and Zambia
How does the ITSCI scheme impact the transparency of mineral supply chains in the DRC
What measures can be taken to ensure that local governments receive a fair share of resource revenues
Search Images
Search Videos
Generate Image
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)